I’ve written a few times about the importance of ‘quality’ in building online communities.
Today the LA Times confronts the question, as a heated screed in response to an editorial on immigration was first left up, then taken down in response to reader reactions.
The comment in question was clearly heated and racially charged.
And I think we have an interest – especially about important and controversial issues – in promoting civil disagreement.
I’m very happy that the Times was willing to bring the issue up for discussion and comment (you can hop in and comment as well).
But there’s something here that makes me a little queasy. I think we play by somewhat different rules when we move from commerce to policy,
Recent Comments